Who On Trial: "The Chase"

Patrick wrote:Objection Over-ruled. Now sit down and quietly lap up your saucer of milk.

Did you get your law degree from the X Factor School of Judgy-Judgenessship?

You can't over-rule a call for recusion. YOU have to prove to US the citizens of the court, that you are fit and impartial enough to conduct this trial in a fair and balanced manner.

So prove it - Mr. Justice Gear-Grinder.

PS:

I'm also reporting you to the RSPCA for deliberate animal cruelty. Trying to force-feed milk to poor, little defenceless kitty's when you know cat's are lactose intolerant. Shame on you.

-And I can call a witness to back up your attempted cruelty...

Cute Witness/Potential Lactose Poison Victim Kitty Cat...

Shows what you know- it was soy milk. Perfect for the lactose intolerant.

Now, can Stanmore please get on with his direct examination? I'd rather not have to find the T-squares in contempt.

The Chase is awesome. Case closed.

Patrick wrote:Shows what you know- it was soy milk. Perfect for the lactose intolerant.

you're supposedly a judge, so we shouldn't have to tell you that your word on that by itself isn't good enough. provide concrete proof/evidence to back up your claim.
oh - and don't think you can just ignore your obvious lack of balance. prove you're fit and fair and quaified to judge this case or RECUSE YOURSELF and get outta town.

Patrick wrote:Now, can Stanmore please get on with his direct examination? I'd rather not have to find the T-squares in contempt.

you can't find us in contempt for pointing out your lack of balance and attempted animal cruelty. besides - who appointed you judge anyway? when this started you were only a clerk of court - suddenly you're in charge. I say you're a fake and petrol-headed impostor!

Rich Flair wrote:The Chase is awesome. Case closed.

YAY! home early. being on a jury is a doddle!

Rich Flair rools.

The prosecutor has had a particularly s*** day - one in which his real-life job hangs by a thread (bloody mental Ulsterwomen with a hatred of incorrect data entry) - so I have had less time to collate evidence than I first anticipated. So, for the time being I'll start with exhibit A...



and, I will, in a more perhaps unheard of in legal history, the defence council to the witness box. I have a feeling that his testimony will be one of the most incriminating against The Chase.

And, because I probably won't be for 24 hours to see if I'm allowed to do this, here's my first question:-

Where were you on the nights of the crime...?

Point of order. Is that allowable Judymeister?

The Co=Ordinator wrote:Rich Flair rools.

Indubitably. And he's also got a cool name too. Like a DJ...or a 80s direct to video action movie star star.

The Co=Ordinator wrote:Point of order. Is that allowable Judymeister?

I say NO!

It's pointless asking Judge Jaundiced. He wouldn't recognise a legitimate legal point even if someone walked up and poked him in the eye with it.

I'll interpret Defense counsel's question as an objection.

Stanmore, I have to question the relevance of this line of questioning: where was Defense counsel the night "The Chase" was transmitted? Unless you can establish a distinct relationship between the Defense counsel (who, in 1965, was little more than a Cyber-toddler at the time), and the production team who made the story, I fear your first line of attack is doomed to failure.

Objection sustained. Sorry about your bad day, though. Do you have another witness?

YAY! His Judgeyness finally makes a smart ruling. Better make the most of it, cos we prolly won't see another.

Oh, and we're sorry you had a bad day too Mr. S.

As the Prosecuting Counsel seems unable to make any sort of case, I move for an immediate dismissal.

The Co=Ordinator wrote:As the Prosecuting Counsel seems unablt to make any sort of case, I move for an immediate dismissal.

SECONDED AND THIRDED!

-I'm voting for both of us-

Stanmore, I really must concur with Defense Counsel. If you are unable to present an argument in the next 24 hours, I will have to make a summary judgement in favor of the Defense.

Indubitably, Mr Justice Tyre-Gage. Go for it!

Dalek can't add up. That's why it's awesome.

I'll make a statement in the next 36 hours. This may or may not be after Patrick has told The Jury how to vote...

That would be ex parte communication, Stanmore. However, 36 hours puts at Thursday, so I will declare the Court in recess until you are ready to proceed.

Patrick wrote:That would be ex parte communication, Stanmore. However, 36 hours puts at Thursday, so I will declare the Court in recess until you are ready to proceed.

do the jury get sequestered? cos we have a business to run you know.

Do you want to be sequestered?

Patrick wrote:Do you want to be sequestered?

Why ask me? The other one said it!

Stop being a judicial bully!

I was asking the other one. Is it my fault the two of you are sharing the same Tessellated?

Patrick wrote:I was asking the other one. Is it my fault the two of you are sharing the same Tessellated?

Well why didn't you just say you was asking the other one? What an I, psychic?

Oh, and don't forget there's another 440 in here besides us two!

Another 440. God help us.